SK needs renewable energy not nuclear waste.

Saskatchewan nuclear waster

Petition to oppose Small Nuclear Reactors in Saskatchewan

 

Saskatchewan can meet its energy needs by increasing renewable and sustainable energy technologies and strategies such as solar, conservation, wind, geothermal, run-of-the-river hydro systems, and hydroelectric importation from Manitoba, among other sustainable energy options. Investing in these would create more jobs while producing energy sooner and at a far lower cost.

Nuclear power is not competitive. Its capital costs are exorbitantly expensive. Most types of nuclear power plants have cost two to four times more than their initial estimates. 

Fred Peterson opposing Nuclear power in Saskatchewan

SMR’s are NOT small. Internet images show a single reactor on a truck's flatbed trailer. Those images do not depict how large an actual SMR power facility will be. With containment building, shielding, exclusion zone, turbine, steam generator, etc., it will be as large as any other kind of comparable thermal power plant. For example, the 300 MWe GE-Hitachi SMR proposed for Saskatchewan would be at least as large as the Queen Elizabeth Power Plant in Saskatoon.

Human Health impacts near nuclear power plants are well documented. Nuclear reactors routinely, not only accidentally, discharge carcinogenic radioactive emissions into the air and water. And nuclear reactors sometimes have accidents which widely contaminate the air, land and water

Plus, the waste from nuclear reactors is not like normal household garbage-type waste. It is radioactive and highly toxic. It would be a long-term financial, security, and environmental burden on current and future generations to manage this waste for thousands of years.

Sign here to add your voice of opposition to SMRs in Saskatchewan.

Who's signing

Joanne Blythe
Carola Giudicelli
Hilda Voth
Carol Vandale
Cathy Holtslander
Lyle Orchard
Catherine Gibson
Robert Clipperton
Judy Schachtel
Victor Lau
Helen Campbell
Florence Stratton
Alison (Ven) Feland
Jessica Watson
Jules Kani
Kim Dongheyon
Paul Murphy
Robin Link
Lisa Opozda
Darcy r Robilliard
Dwight Courteau
Robert Brownlie
Mark Bigland-Pritchard
Riel Atsu
Todd Rogers
Erin Nordin
Josh Engen
Tristan Thomas
Sharon Bird
Michael Gardiner
119 SIGNATURES
GOAL: 500 signatures

Will you sign?


Showing 98 reactions

  • Joanne Blythe
  • Carola Giudicelli
  • Hilda Voth
  • Carol Vandale
  • Cathy Holtslander
  • Lyle Orchard
  • Catherine Gibson
  • Robert Clipperton
  • Judy Schachtel
  • Victor Lau
  • Helen Campbell
  • Florence Stratton
  • Alison (Ven) Feland
    Investing in small nuclear reactors would not benefit the province in the long run. The resulting waste and emissions are both dangerous and irresponsible, in the face of climate change.
  • Jessica Watson
  • Jules Kani
  • Kim Dongheyon
  • Paul Murphy
  • Robin Link
  • Lisa Opozda
    Please know that my husband and I are with you all. This would be devastating to central North Dakota as well as Southern Saskatchewan.
  • Darcy r Robilliard
  • Dwight Courteau
  • Robert Brownlie
  • Mark Bigland-Pritchard
    Nuclear (of any sort) would be too late to seriously address the climate crisis, would cost substantially more than the renewables-based alternative, and it inflexibility would make integration of renewables on the grid more difficult. It also adds to the risk of nuclear weapons proliferation. And there is, to date, no fully credible plan for the resulting waste. (And, even if a repository goes ahead in Ontario for existing nuclear waste, against the will of the Indigenous communities in whose territory it is planned, the proposed BWRX plants would require a different design of repository and therefore a new site – again, probably, in violation of Indigenous rights.)
  • Riel Atsu
  • Todd Rogers
  • Erin Nordin
  • Josh Engen
  • Tristan Thomas
  • Sharon Bird
  • Michael Gardiner