Whereas the ability to issue tax receipts has changed since the writing of by-law 9.7 and whereas clear and formalized co-ordination must be established between different levels of the party concerning fundraising.
Be It Resolved that we amend section 9.7 to the following fund sharing formula, and remove section 9.11 completely.
9.7 – All funds raised by the GPS or a Constituency Association or shall be allocated in the following proportions:
9.7.1– 100% of unsolicited donations received by the GPS stay at the GPS.
9.7.2- If the GPS solicits a donation from a member living in a riding with an established Constituency Association, 50% of the raised funds will stay with the GPS and 50% will be transferred to the Constituency Association of the member.
9.7.3 - If a Constituency Association solicits a donation, 80% of the raised funds will stay with the CA and 20% will be transferred to the GPS.
9.7.4 - The GPS must co-ordinate fundraising efforts with Constituency Associations by giving at least two weeks notice before a members of an established CA are contacted for fundraising purposes.
9.7.5 - All funds raised during a candidates election campaign remain with the candidate. Any surplus funds at the end of a campaign will be transferred to the CA, if it is established, or to the GPS.
I agree that changes in "the
I agree that changes in "the ability to issue tax receipts" require us to modify 9.7.1, 9.7.2, and 9.11. All that is needed to satisfy this requirement is something like the following motion:
Be it resolved:
The wholesale replacement of 9.7 / 9.11 proposed in this motion introduces the following "unclarities":
The motivation behind some of the proposed changes is unclear.
I support the intent of adding something like 9.7.5, because the current Bylaws give no guidance on campaign donations. The proposed wording includes the undefined term "GPS" (in this context), and talks about funds remaining "with the candidate" rather than with "the campaign fund", which I believe is more aligned with the Provincial legislation. There should be some reference made to the Provincial legislation, too, if only acknowledging that it takes precedence over the Bylaws. This is the sort of work that should be done by a committee before submitting a motion like this to the general membership. As there is such a committee established now, why not refer this and the other proposed changes (aside from those related to tax receipts) to that committee?